Prediction of James Kent Trotter [176th] vs Learner Tien [69th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L L
Form
W W W L L L L W W LHead To Head: Trotter 1 - 1 Tien
They have played 6 sets in total, with Trotter winning 3 and Tien winning 3. The last match between Trotter and Tien was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 02-11-2024, Semifinals, I.hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Kent Trotter | 1 |
| Learner Tien | 1 |
| Trotter | Stats | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (9-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (13-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 176 | Ranking | 69 |
| 173 | Highest Rank | 66 |
| 25 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 10 |
| 59% (99-68) | Career Total W/L | 73% (118-43) |
| $79,295 | Career Prize Money | $431,935 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
James Kent Trotter
Player
Learner Tien
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 27 | Games Won | 27 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:57:48 | Average Match Time | 1:57:48 |
| 60% (110/184) | 1st Serve % | 59% (92/157) |
| 68% (75/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (59/92) |
| 39% (29/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (33/65) |
| 64% (9/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 41% (65/157) | Return Points Win % | 43% (80/184) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
James Kent Trotter vs Learner Tien Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 1 Tien
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 50.22% of points on their second serve, while Tien has won 41.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 41.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tien has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.27% and 26.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 60.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tien has saved 54.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 42/ 24), with Tien winning 79.12% (W/L 72/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 37/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Tien has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 92/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 39/ 18), where as Tien has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 81.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Trotter winning 1 times and Tien being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Trotter winning 3 and Tien winning 3. The last match between Trotter and Tien was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 02-11-2024, Semifinals, I.hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Tien have played a deciding set 2 times, with Trotter winning 1 times and Tien 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 0, and Tien 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.61 while Tien has played against players with an average rank of 199.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tien has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 29.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tien has converted 34.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
James Kent Trotter vs Learner Tien Best Odds For The Match
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
James McCabe
59%
(
78 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
7
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
5
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
53 of
74)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
32%
(
42 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
129)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(9) 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Ryan Seggerman
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
6
Aces
23
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Trotter vs Tien?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Trotter Vs Tien is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (99/68) | Win/Loss | 73% (118/43) |
| 56% (215/171) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (258/136) |
| 52% (2022/1830) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2050/1647) |
| 0.73 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1375 | Aces Total | 470 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 486 | Total Double Faults | 462 |
| 1:38:29 | Average Match Time | 1:41:39 |
| 243.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.24 |
| 59% (6535/11029) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7296/11605) |
| 77% (5012/6535) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4916/7296) |
| 51% (2308/4494) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2219/4309) |
| 39% (342/883) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (596/1263) |
| 36% (4016/11076) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4905/11540) |
| 59% (97/165) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (110/147) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 54% (44/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (39/63) |
| 65% (35/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (39/52) |
| 89% (85/76) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (102/97) |
| 11% (85/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (102/5) |
| 28% (82/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 36% (59/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
