Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Kent Trotter vs Learner Tien Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs Tien analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
James Kent Trotter vs Learner Tien Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trotter 0 - 1 Tien
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 50.06% of points on their second serve, while Tien has won 56.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 46.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tien has won 57.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.11% and 40.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 63.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tien has saved 64.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Tien winning 82.35% (W/L 42/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 44/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 23), where as Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 89.19% of matches (W/L 33/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trotter winning 0 times and Tien being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Trotter winning 1 and Tien winning 2. The last match between Trotter and Tien was at the Bloomfield Hills Challenger, 01-07-2024, First, Hard with Learner Tien getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Tien have played a deciding set 1 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and Tien 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 0, and Tien 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.26 while Tien has played against players with an average rank of 103.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tien has won 79% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 42.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tien has converted 52.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
283
Rank
272
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
342
Rank
342
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
58% (67-49)
Career Total W/L
73% (62-23)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
87% (20-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For James Kent Trotter vs Learner Tien For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Trotter VS Tien
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:15 | 2:7:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (57/99) | 58% (45/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (32/57) | 64% (29/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (15/42) | 42% (14/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 57% (8/14) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (35/78) | 53% (52/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Learner Tien
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 87% (20/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (38/29) | 77% (41/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (362/319) | 63% (304/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 91% (20/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 238 | 66 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 113 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:43 | 1:34:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 279.06 | 103.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1209/2090) | 62% (944/1532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (927/1209) | 69% (652/944) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (441/881) | 56% (332/588) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (70/164) | 53% (107/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (734/2007) | 47% (714/1515) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (18/13) | 71% (5/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 94% (15/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 87% (20/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 86% (6/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 100% (18/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (18/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 40% (5/2) |
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trevor Svajda
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
James Kent Trotter
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Matthew Summers
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Trevor Svajda
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Brumm
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Oliver Tarvet
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Patrick Maloney
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
2
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
8
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Isaac Becroft
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Trotter Vs Tien Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Trotter are available here and Tien photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Learner Tien
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
